Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 3519"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|alt_msg=NA | |alt_msg=NA | ||
|type=[[CHECK]] | |type=[[CHECK]] | ||
| − | |message_desc=If the DEM is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. In such case using a gully line may overestimate the width of the flow path as it makes the entire cell and face flat. | + | |message_desc=If the DEM's resolution is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. In such case using a gully line may overestimate the width of the flow path as it makes the entire cell and face flat. |
| − | |suggestions=Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line | + | |suggestions=Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line. If so, the topography modification MIN or GULLY option can be removed. |
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3519|Discuss Message 3519]] | |discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3519|Discuss Message 3519]] | ||
|link3='' | |link3='' | ||
Revision as of 09:30, 23 September 2020
TUFLOW Message
CHECK 3519: Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model.
Alternate Message
NA
Message Type
CHECK
Description
If the DEM's resolution is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. In such case using a gully line may overestimate the width of the flow path as it makes the entire cell and face flat.
Suggestions
Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line. If so, the topography modification MIN or GULLY option can be removed.
| Up |
|---|
 3xxx Messages
|