Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 2241"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Melissa1987 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|alt_msg=NA | |alt_msg=NA | ||
|type=[[CHECK]] | |type=[[CHECK]] | ||
| − | |message_desc=A default slope can be specified for a HQ type boundary using the <tt>BLANK HQ SLOPE == <slope value></tt> command in the .tbc file. This default will apply to all HQ boundary objects in the 2d_bc layer which have no name or slope specified. In this case a default slope has been applied to the object. | + | |message_desc=A default slope can be specified for a HQ type boundary using the <tt><font color="blue">BLANK HQ SLOPE </font><font color="red">== </font><font color="black"><slope value></font></tt> command in the .tbc file. This default will apply to all HQ boundary objects in the 2d_bc layer which have no name or slope specified. In this case a default slope has been applied to the object. |
|suggestions=Check to ensure that the application of the HQ boundary slope is correct. See also the <u>[[Check_Files_2d_bc_tables | _2d_bc_tables.csv check file]]</u> for the derived level-flow relationship. | |suggestions=Check to ensure that the application of the HQ boundary slope is correct. See also the <u>[[Check_Files_2d_bc_tables | _2d_bc_tables.csv check file]]</u> for the derived level-flow relationship. | ||
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2241|Discuss Message 2241]] | |discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2241|Discuss Message 2241]] | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 27 June 2022
TUFLOW Message
CHECK 2241 - 2D BC HQ object has no name or slope. Using HQ slope value of ",a," specified in .tbc"
Alternate Message
NA
Message Type
CHECK
Description
A default slope can be specified for a HQ type boundary using the BLANK HQ SLOPE == <slope value> command in the .tbc file. This default will apply to all HQ boundary objects in the 2d_bc layer which have no name or slope specified. In this case a default slope has been applied to the object.
Suggestions
Check to ensure that the application of the HQ boundary slope is correct. See also the _2d_bc_tables.csv check file for the derived level-flow relationship.
| Up |
|---|
 2xxx Messages
|