TUFLOW Benchmarking - Revision history

Pavlina Monhartova at 05:07, 24 July 2025

2025-07-24T05:07:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 24 July 2025
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Image:GPU Stormwater Model Speed Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://downloads.tuflow.com/_archive/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)]		Image:GPU Stormwater Model Speed Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://downloads.tuflow.com/_archive/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)]
	Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2017/Apr/FloodStudies/Attachments/TechnicalSummary.PDF Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)]		Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2017/Apr/FloodStudies/Attachments/TechnicalSummary.PDF Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)]
	Image:Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[~~Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA)~~ \| Computer Hardware Benchmark Comparsions- What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]]		Image:Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[Hardware_Benchmarking \| Computer Hardware Benchmark Comparsions- What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]]
	</gallery>		</gallery>
	\|-		\|-
Line 133:		Line 133:
	The link below summarises computer specifications and model simulation times for a benchmark model that is run using TUFLOW Classic (CPU) and TUFLOW GPU. The results are a useful resource for people who are upgrading hardware for the specific purpose of modelling.<br>		The link below summarises computer specifications and model simulation times for a benchmark model that is run using TUFLOW Classic (CPU) and TUFLOW GPU. The results are a useful resource for people who are upgrading hardware for the specific purpose of modelling.<br>

	* [[~~Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA)~~ \| Hardware Benchmarking]]		* [[Hardware_Benchmarking \| Hardware Benchmarking]]

Emilie Nielsen at 02:07, 19 July 2024

2024-07-19T02:07:29Z

Show changes

Pavlina Monhartova: /* Recently Uploaded */

2024-05-28T15:56:34Z

Recently Uploaded

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 29 May 2024
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Image:UK_EA_Benchmark_Testing_2017_002.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/UK%20EA%202D%20Benchmarking%20Results.TUFLOW%20Products%202017-09.pdf UK Environment Agency 2D Benchmarking Results - TUFLOW Products (2017)]		Image:UK_EA_Benchmark_Testing_2017_002.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/UK%20EA%202D%20Benchmarking%20Results.TUFLOW%20Products%202017-09.pdf UK Environment Agency 2D Benchmarking Results - TUFLOW Products (2017)]
	Image:GPU Stormwater Model Speed Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)]		Image:GPU Stormwater Model Speed Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)]
	Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://~~cloudstor~~.~~aarnet~~.~~edu~~.au/~~plus~~/s/~~kbK0b75dVbt6u9m#pdfviewer~~ Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)]		Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2017/Apr/FloodStudies/Attachments/TechnicalSummary.PDF Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)]
	Image:Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA) \| Computer Hardware Benchmark Comparsions- What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]]		Image:Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA) \| Computer Hardware Benchmark Comparsions- What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]]
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Emilie Nielsen: /* Other Benchmark Studies */

2024-04-05T01:22:57Z

Other Benchmark Studies

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 5 April 2024
Line 94:		Line 94:
	*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dambreak_Benchmark_ANCOLD2018_WRM.pdf Assessing the Accuracy of a Two-dimensional Hydraulic Model for Dambreak Analysis: Sheehy et al (ANCOLD, 2018)]</li>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dambreak_Benchmark_ANCOLD2018_WRM.pdf Assessing the Accuracy of a Two-dimensional Hydraulic Model for Dambreak Analysis: Sheehy et al (ANCOLD, 2018)]</li>
	<li>The Environment Agency in the United Kingdom have documented independent testing of most 2D modelling packages. Testing was undertaken in both 2010 and 2013 and all three TUFLOW engines were submitted for testing in 2013. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software. The tests have subsequently been rerun and documented using the latest version of TUFLOW in 2017: <br>		<li>The Environment Agency in the United Kingdom have documented independent testing of most 2D modelling packages. Testing was undertaken in both 2010 and 2013 and all three TUFLOW engines were submitted for testing in 2013. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software. The tests have subsequently been rerun and documented using the latest version of TUFLOW in 2017: <br>
	*[https://~~evidence.environment-agency~~.gov.uk/~~FCERM~~/~~Libraries~~/~~FCERM_Project_Documents/SC120002_Benchmarking_2D_hydraulic_models_Report.sflb.ashx~~ Benchmarking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2013)]</li>		*[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/benchmarking-the-latest-generation-of-2d-hydraulic-flood-modelling-packages Benchmarking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2013)]</li>
	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2010)]		*[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2010)]
	The above benchmark documents have been superseded by the document below. It is a revision of the benchmark modelling using the 2017-09-AC version of TUFLOW. It includes results for TUFLOW Classic, FV, GPU and the new TUFLOW HPC solver.		The above benchmark documents have been superseded by the document below. It is a revision of the benchmark modelling using the 2017-09-AC version of TUFLOW. It includes results for TUFLOW Classic, FV, GPU and the new TUFLOW HPC solver.

Abigail.lillo: /* Real World Calibration/Validation */

2024-01-24T03:19:52Z

Real World Calibration/Validation

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 24 January 2024
Line 122:		Line 122:

	* [https://publications.qld.gov.au/dataset/brisbane-river-catchment-flood-study Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study (All Reports)]		* [https://publications.qld.gov.au/dataset/brisbane-river-catchment-flood-study Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study (All Reports)]
	* [https://~~cloudstor~~.~~aarnet~~.~~edu~~.au/~~plus~~/s/~~kbK0b75dVbt6u9m#pdfviewer~~ Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study (Detailed Model Calibration Report)]		* [https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/ckan-publications-attachments-prod/resources/16440193-2c27-45c6-850a-2ce1b1a30dd5/r.b20702.003.01.mr3.detailed-model-development-and-calibration.pdf?ETag=a40ed14f8169c7582e7ec838a1a38b51 Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study (Detailed Model Calibration Report)]
	* [https://~~www.clarence~~.nsw.gov.au/~~page.asp?f=RES-FRE-61-54-36~~ ~~Lower~~ ~~Clarence~~ Flood ~~Model Update~~]		* [https://richmondvalley.nsw.gov.au/services/flood/ Richmond River Flood Study]
			* [https://www.clarence.nsw.gov.au/Council/Our-performance/Plans-and-strategies/Floodplain-Management-plans-flood-studies-and-animations# Lower Clarence Flood Study Update]
	* [http://www.kyogle.nsw.gov.au/cp_content/resources/Kyogle_Floodplain_Risk_Management_Study1126200917017.pdf Kyogle Flood Risk Management Study]
			* [https://www.kyogle.nsw.gov.au/infrastructure-environment/environment/kyogle-flood-study/ Kyogle Flood Risk Management Study]
	* [http://www.cassowarycoast.qld.gov.au/documents/1422210/42658658/0.%20Report%20part%201.pdf Cassowary Coast Regional Council Flood Study - Part 1]
	* [~~http~~://www.cassowarycoast.qld.gov.au/~~documents~~/~~1422210~~/~~42658658~~/~~0.%20Report%20part%202.pdf~~ ~~Cassowary~~ ~~Coast Regional Council~~ Flood Study - ~~Part~~ 2]		* [https://www.cassowarycoast.qld.gov.au/downloads/file/1740/johnstone-river-flood-study-vol-1-of-2-final Johnston River Flood Study - Volume 1]
			* [https://www.tweed.nsw.gov.au/files/assets/public/v/1/documents/property-and-rates/floods-and-stormwater/coastal-creeks-flood-study-2009.pdf Coastal Creeks Flood Study]
	* [http://www.cassowarycoast.qld.gov.au/documents/1422210/42658658/1.%20Drawing%20Addendum%20-%20Contents%20Calibration%20and%20Validation%20Resuts%20part%203.pdf Cassowary Coast Regional Council Flood Study - Drawing Addendum]
	* [~~http~~://www.~~cassowarycoast~~.qld.gov.au/c/~~document_library~~/~~get_file?uuid=b8cb70fa~~-~~3111~~-~~4fc8~~-~~91db~~-~~02a64504ea96&groupId=1422210~~ ~~Johnston River~~ Flood Study ~~- Volume 1~~]		* [https://www.northburnett.qld.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/3-Gayndah-Flood-Study-Vol-1.pdf Gayndah Flood Study]
	* [http://www.tweed.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Flooding/Tweed%20Valley%20Flood%20Study/TSC00290_TweedValleyFloodStudy2009Update.pdf Tweed Valley Flood Study]
	* [http://www.tweed.nsw.gov.au/item/890 Coastal Creeks Flood Study]
	* [http://www.northburnett.qld.gov.au/res/file/Gayndah%20Flood%20Study%20Vol%201.pdf Gayndah Flood Study]
	* [http://www.richmondvalley.nsw.gov.au/icms_docs/137639_Richmond_River_Flood_Mapping_Final_Report.pdf Richmond River Flood Mapping Study]

	= Hardware Benchmark Testing =		= Hardware Benchmark Testing =

Pavlina Monhartova at 01:51, 8 January 2024

2024-01-08T01:51:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 8 January 2024
Line 39:		Line 39:
	[[File:Boyte_2014_Catchment.PNG\|400px]]		[[File:Boyte_2014_Catchment.PNG\|400px]]
	<br>		<br>
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/2012Boyte_DirectRainfallValidation.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Boyte, 2014)]<br>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/2012Boyte_DirectRainfallValidation.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Boyte, 2014)]<br>
	== Leister (2010) ==		== Leister (2010) ==
	The author undertook research to ascertain the accuracy of TUFLOW in calculating the energy losses associated with the contraction and expansion of flow through a constriction and to ascertain the most appropriate method/s for reliably modelling the energy losses associated with bridge piers. To undertake the research 2D model results were compared to physical flume test undertaken by Liu et al (1957).		The author undertook research to ascertain the accuracy of TUFLOW in calculating the energy losses associated with the contraction and expansion of flow through a constriction and to ascertain the most appropriate method/s for reliably modelling the energy losses associated with bridge piers. To undertake the research 2D model results were compared to physical flume test undertaken by Liu et al (1957).
Line 47:		Line 47:
	The results from the analysis undertaken have shown that TUFLOW can, within reasonable bounds, reproduce the results of the physical model. Recommendations regarding the modeling of constrictions and piers within a 2D hydraulic model are made.		The results from the analysis undertaken have shown that TUFLOW can, within reasonable bounds, reproduce the results of the physical model. Recommendations regarding the modeling of constrictions and piers within a 2D hydraulic model are made.
	<br>		<br>
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Leister_2010_Masters_Thesis.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Leister, 2010)]<br>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Leister_2010_Masters_Thesis.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Leister, 2010)]<br>
	== Caddis (2010) ==		== Caddis (2010) ==

Line 55:		Line 55:
	* Assess the influence that varying soil types have on surface runoff; and		* Assess the influence that varying soil types have on surface runoff; and
	* Assess the influence that ponding depth has on infiltration, and the subsequent affect on surface runoff.<br>		* Assess the influence that ponding depth has on infiltration, and the subsequent affect on surface runoff.<br>
	*[~~http~~://tuflow.com/Download/Publications/R.Masters.01.002.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Caddis, 2010)]<br>		*[https://tuflow.com/Download/Publications/R.Masters.01.002.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Caddis, 2010)]<br>
	== Huxley (2004) ==		== Huxley (2004) ==
	This thesis validates TUFLOW against independent analytical calculations. The study used over 300 benchmark models to verify the accuracy of TUFLOW for a range of flow conditions (super critical, critical and subcritical). The specific test cases included:		This thesis validates TUFLOW against independent analytical calculations. The study used over 300 benchmark models to verify the accuracy of TUFLOW for a range of flow conditions (super critical, critical and subcritical). The specific test cases included:
Line 68:		Line 68:

	[[File:Huxley_2004_Variance.PNG\|400px]]<br>		[[File:Huxley_2004_Variance.PNG\|400px]]<br>
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/TUFLOW%20Validation%20and%20Testing,%20Huxley,%202004.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Huxley, 2004)]<br>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/TUFLOW%20Validation%20and%20Testing,%20Huxley,%202004.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Huxley, 2004)]<br>

	== Barton (2001) ==		== Barton (2001) ==
Line 79:		Line 79:

	[[File:Barton_2009.PNG\|400px]]<br>		[[File:Barton_2009.PNG\|400px]]<br>
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Flow%20Through%20an%20Abrupt%20Constriction%20-%202D%20Hydrodynamic%20Performance%20and%20Influence%20of%20Spatial%20Resolution,%20Barton,%202001.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Barton, 2001)]<br>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Flow%20Through%20an%20Abrupt%20Constriction%20-%202D%20Hydrodynamic%20Performance%20and%20Influence%20of%20Spatial%20Resolution,%20Barton,%202001.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Barton, 2001)]<br>
	== Syme (1991) ==		== Syme (1991) ==
	TUFLOW was first developed as a result of this Masters study. This thesis summarises the mathematical theory that underpins TUFLOW. It presents a discussion on the process of selecting TUFLOW's 1D and 2D schemes. It also details:		TUFLOW was first developed as a result of this Masters study. This thesis summarises the mathematical theory that underpins TUFLOW. It presents a discussion on the process of selecting TUFLOW's 1D and 2D schemes. It also details:
Line 85:		Line 85:
	* The wetting and drying method; the dynamic 2D/1D link; and		* The wetting and drying method; the dynamic 2D/1D link; and
	* The stabilisation of oblique water level boundaries. <br>		* The stabilisation of oblique water level boundaries. <br>
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dynamically%20Linked%202D%20and%201D%20Hydrodynamic%20Modelling,%20Syme,%201991.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Syme, 1991)]<br>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dynamically%20Linked%202D%20and%201D%20Hydrodynamic%20Modelling,%20Syme,%201991.pdf Click Here To Open Thesis (Syme, 1991)]<br>

	= Other Benchmark Studies =		= Other Benchmark Studies =

Melissa.Moghanloo: Update link to https

2023-09-27T01:12:16Z

Update link to https

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 27 September 2023
Line 115:		Line 115:

	<li>Additional TUFLOW benchmark articles are available from the "Library" section of the TUFLOW website:		<li>Additional TUFLOW benchmark articles are available from the "Library" section of the TUFLOW website:
	*http://www.tuflow.com/Library.aspx</li>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Library.aspx http://www.tuflow.com/Library.aspx]</li>
	</ol>		</ol>

Melissa.Moghanloo: Update link to https

2023-09-27T01:09:40Z

Update link to https

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 27 September 2023
Line 112:		Line 112:

	<li>Bill Syme presented model validation results for a case study in the Eudlo Creek Catchment, Australia at the 2006 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference. TUFLOW was benchmarked against a physical model and FESWMS.		<li>Bill Syme presented model validation results for a case study in the Eudlo Creek Catchment, Australia at the 2006 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference. TUFLOW was benchmarked against a physical model and FESWMS.
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/2006.05%20-%20Bruce%20Highway%20Eudlo%20Ck%20Hydraulic%20Investigations%20-%20A%20Turning%20Point.Syme.ASFPM%202006.pdf Bruce Highway Eudlo Creek Hydraulic Investigations (ASFPM Conference, 2006)]</li>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/2006.05%20-%20Bruce%20Highway%20Eudlo%20Ck%20Hydraulic%20Investigations%20-%20A%20Turning%20Point.Syme.ASFPM%202006.pdf Bruce Highway Eudlo Creek Hydraulic Investigations (ASFPM Conference, 2006)]</li>

	<li>Additional TUFLOW benchmark articles are available from the "Library" section of the TUFLOW website:		<li>Additional TUFLOW benchmark articles are available from the "Library" section of the TUFLOW website:

Melissa.Moghanloo: Update link to https

2023-09-27T01:04:46Z

Update link to https

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 27 September 2023
Line 109:		Line 109:
	<li>Bill Syme presented model validation/benchmark results for bends, structures and obstructions at the 2011 Australian TUFLOW Workshop and 2011 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference		<li>Bill Syme presented model validation/benchmark results for bends, structures and obstructions at the 2011 Australian TUFLOW Workshop and 2011 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference
	*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2012/2012%20Aust%20Workshops%20-%20TUFLOW%20Modelling%20Bends,%20Structures%20and%20Obstructions.pdf 1D and 2D Modelling of Bends, Structures and Obstructions (TUFLOW Workshop, 2011)]		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2012/2012%20Aust%20Workshops%20-%20TUFLOW%20Modelling%20Bends,%20Structures%20and%20Obstructions.pdf 1D and 2D Modelling of Bends, Structures and Obstructions (TUFLOW Workshop, 2011)]
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM Conference, 2011)]</li>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM Conference, 2011)]</li>

	<li>Bill Syme presented model validation results for a case study in the Eudlo Creek Catchment, Australia at the 2006 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference. TUFLOW was benchmarked against a physical model and FESWMS.		<li>Bill Syme presented model validation results for a case study in the Eudlo Creek Catchment, Australia at the 2006 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference. TUFLOW was benchmarked against a physical model and FESWMS.

Melissa.Moghanloo: Update link to https

2023-09-27T01:03:30Z

Update link to https

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 29 May 2024
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Image:UK_EA_Benchmark_Testing_2017_002.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/UK%20EA%202D%20Benchmarking%20Results.TUFLOW%20Products%202017-09.pdf UK Environment Agency 2D Benchmarking Results - TUFLOW Products (2017)]		Image:UK_EA_Benchmark_Testing_2017_002.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/UK%20EA%202D%20Benchmarking%20Results.TUFLOW%20Products%202017-09.pdf UK Environment Agency 2D Benchmarking Results - TUFLOW Products (2017)]
	Image:GPU Stormwater Model Speed Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)]		Image:GPU Stormwater Model Speed Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)]
	Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://~~cloudstor~~.~~aarnet~~.~~edu~~.au/~~plus~~/s/~~kbK0b75dVbt6u9m#pdfviewer~~ Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)]		Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2017/Apr/FloodStudies/Attachments/TechnicalSummary.PDF Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)]
	Image:Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA) \| Computer Hardware Benchmark Comparsions- What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]]		Image:Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA) \| Computer Hardware Benchmark Comparsions- What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]]
	</gallery>		</gallery>

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 27 September 2023
Line 94:		Line 94:
	*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dambreak_Benchmark_ANCOLD2018_WRM.pdf Assessing the Accuracy of a Two-dimensional Hydraulic Model for Dambreak Analysis: Sheehy et al (ANCOLD, 2018)]</li>		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dambreak_Benchmark_ANCOLD2018_WRM.pdf Assessing the Accuracy of a Two-dimensional Hydraulic Model for Dambreak Analysis: Sheehy et al (ANCOLD, 2018)]</li>
	<li>The Environment Agency in the United Kingdom have documented independent testing of most 2D modelling packages. Testing was undertaken in both 2010 and 2013 and all three TUFLOW engines were submitted for testing in 2013. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software. The tests have subsequently been rerun and documented using the latest version of TUFLOW in 2017: <br>		<li>The Environment Agency in the United Kingdom have documented independent testing of most 2D modelling packages. Testing was undertaken in both 2010 and 2013 and all three TUFLOW engines were submitted for testing in 2013. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software. The tests have subsequently been rerun and documented using the latest version of TUFLOW in 2017: <br>
	*[~~http~~://evidence.environment-agency.gov.uk/FCERM/Libraries/FCERM_Project_Documents/SC120002_Benchmarking_2D_hydraulic_models_Report.sflb.ashx Benchmarking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2013)]</li>		*[https://evidence.environment-agency.gov.uk/FCERM/Libraries/FCERM_Project_Documents/SC120002_Benchmarking_2D_hydraulic_models_Report.sflb.ashx Benchmarking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2013)]</li>
	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2010)]~~</li>~~		*[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2010)]
	The above benchmark documents have been superseded by the document below. It is a revision of the benchmark modelling using the 2017-09-AC version of TUFLOW. It includes results for TUFLOW Classic, FV, GPU and the new TUFLOW HPC solver.		The above benchmark documents have been superseded by the document below. It is a revision of the benchmark modelling using the 2017-09-AC version of TUFLOW. It includes results for TUFLOW Classic, FV, GPU and the new TUFLOW HPC solver.
	*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/UK%20EA%202D%20Benchmarking%20Results.TUFLOW%20Products%202017-09.pdf United Kingdom Environment Agency 2D Benchmarking Results - TUFLOW Products (2017)]~~</li>~~		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/UK%20EA%202D%20Benchmarking%20Results.TUFLOW%20Products%202017-09.pdf United Kingdom Environment Agency 2D Benchmarking Results - TUFLOW Products (2017)]

	<li>Chris Huxley compared the speed of TUFLOW Classic against the TUFLOW HPC for high resolution integrated urban drainage applications. The modelling included the underground stormwater network and 1D elements and 2D for the representation of above ground flooding. Models ranging in size from 7,500 2D cells to 12,500,000 2D cells were assessed.		<li>Chris Huxley compared the speed of TUFLOW Classic against the TUFLOW HPC for high resolution integrated urban drainage applications. The modelling included the underground stormwater network and 1D elements and 2D for the representation of above ground flooding. Models ranging in size from 7,500 2D cells to 12,500,000 2D cells were assessed.
Line 105:		Line 105:
	*[[Wood_Rodgers_FMA2015 \| Wood Rodgers Model Benchmark Testing (FMA Conference, 2015)]]</li>		*[[Wood_Rodgers_FMA2015 \| Wood Rodgers Model Benchmark Testing (FMA Conference, 2015)]]</li>
	Chris Huxley built on the dataset for the 2015 TUFLOW User Conference		Chris Huxley built on the dataset for the 2015 TUFLOW User Conference
	*[[Benchmark_Comparison_User_Conference2015 \| Model Benchmark Testing (TUFLOW User Conference, 2015)]]~~</li>~~		*[[Benchmark_Comparison_User_Conference2015 \| Model Benchmark Testing (TUFLOW User Conference, 2015)]]

	<li>Bill Syme presented model validation/benchmark results for bends, structures and obstructions at the 2011 Australian TUFLOW Workshop and 2011 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference		<li>Bill Syme presented model validation/benchmark results for bends, structures and obstructions at the 2011 Australian TUFLOW Workshop and 2011 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference
	*[~~http~~://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2012/2012%20Aust%20Workshops%20-%20TUFLOW%20Modelling%20Bends,%20Structures%20and%20Obstructions.pdf 1D and 2D Modelling of Bends, Structures and Obstructions (TUFLOW Workshop, 2011)]		*[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2012/2012%20Aust%20Workshops%20-%20TUFLOW%20Modelling%20Bends,%20Structures%20and%20Obstructions.pdf 1D and 2D Modelling of Bends, Structures and Obstructions (TUFLOW Workshop, 2011)]
	*[http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM Conference, 2011)]</li>		*[http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM Conference, 2011)]</li>