TUFLOW Message 3027 - Revision history

Melissa.Moghanloo at 00:15, 3 March 2023

2023-03-03T00:15:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:15, 3 March 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\|suggestions=Ensure that all materials that utilise log-law roughness have positive values for mannings n.		\|suggestions=Ensure that all materials that utilise log-law roughness have positive values for mannings n.

	\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026\|Message 3026]]
	\|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|3xxx Messages]]		\|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|3xxx Messages]]
	\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3028\|Message 3028]]
	}}		}}

Emilie Nielsen at 06:09, 2 March 2023

2023-03-02T06:09:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 2 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{TUFLOW_Message		{{TUFLOW_Message
	\|tuflow_message=ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.		\|tuflow_message=ERROR 3027 - Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.
	<br>		<br>
	\|alt_msg=~~None~~		\|alt_msg=NA<br>

	\|type=[[ERROR]]		\|type=[[ERROR]]
			\|message_desc=Materials may use use either fixed mannings, depth-varying mannings, or log-law roughness formulations for bed resistance.
	\|message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0.
			When utilising log-law roughness, a maximum limit for equivalent mannings number is required as the formulation becomes singular at shallow depths.
	\|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.
			This limit, provided as the fixed mannings n value in the material data, must be greater than zero.
			\|suggestions=Ensure that all materials that utilise log-law roughness have positive values for mannings n.

	\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026\|Message 3026]]		\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026\|Message 3026]]

Melissa.Moghanloo at 05:19, 13 July 2022

2022-07-13T05:19:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 13 July 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.		\|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.

	\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027\|Discuss Message 3027]]
	\|link3=''
	\|link4=''
	\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026\|Message 3026]]		\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026\|Message 3026]]
	\|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|3xxx Messages]]		\|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|3xxx Messages]]

Teegan.Burke at 23:37, 19 April 2018

2018-04-19T23:37:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 20 April 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\|type=[[ERROR]]		\|type=[[ERROR]]
	\|message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0.		\|message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0.
	\|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value based on the n value that would normally be applied is ~~also~~ specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.		\|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.

	\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027\|Discuss Message 3027]]		\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027\|Discuss Message 3027]]

Teegan.Burke: Created page with "{{TUFLOW_Message |tuflow_message=ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.
|alt_msg=None |type=ERROR |message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n va..."

2018-04-19T07:11:09Z

Created page with "{{TUFLOW_Message |tuflow_message=ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0. <br> |alt_msg=None |type=ERROR |message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n va..."

New page

{{TUFLOW_Message
|tuflow_message=ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.
<br>
|alt_msg=None

|type=[[ERROR]]
|message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0.
|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value based on the n value that would normally be applied is also specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.

|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027|Discuss Message 3027]]
|link3=''
|link4=''
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026|Message 3026]]
|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|3xxx Messages]]
|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3028|Message 3028]]
}}

TUFLOW Message 3027 - Revision history

Melissa.Moghanloo at 00:15, 3 March 2023

Emilie Nielsen at 06:09, 2 March 2023

Melissa.Moghanloo at 05:19, 13 July 2022

Teegan.Burke at 23:37, 19 April 2018

Teegan.Burke: Created page with "{{TUFLOW_Message |tuflow_message=ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0. |alt_msg=None |type=ERROR |message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n va..."

Teegan.Burke: Created page with "{{TUFLOW_Message |tuflow_message=ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.
|alt_msg=None |type=ERROR |message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n va..."