Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 2169"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|type=[[WARNING]] | |type=[[WARNING]] | ||
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br> | |message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both. | |suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both. | ||
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169|Discuss Message 2169]] | |discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169|Discuss Message 2169]] |
Revision as of 09:08, 4 July 2022
TUFLOW Message
WARNING 2169 - THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored.
Alternate Message
NA
Message Type
WARNING
Description
THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.
Suggestions
Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.
Up |
---|
2xxx Messages |