TUFLOW Message 1069: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 16:24, 21 June 2022 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 14:40, 22 December 2022 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: \|alt_msg=NA \|type=[[ERROR]] \|message_desc=The Material ID specified in the cross-section is not defined in the materials dataset (as defined by the "<font color="blue"><tt>Read Materials File </tt></font><font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font>" in the .tcf). When using the "M" flag on 1D cross-sections, TUFLOW is expecting an integer material ID. The roughness value is obtained from the material dataset.<br> This is in contrast to the "N" flag, if this flag is used the Manning's value is defined on the cross-section. \|suggestions=Check that the material ID specified exists in the Materials dataset. If the outputted material ID in the error message is 0, check that a material ID and not a Manning's value has been specified on the cross-section. ~~\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 1069\|Discuss Message 1069]]~~ ~~\|link3=''~~ ~~\|link4=''~~ ~~\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_1068\|Message 1068]]~~ \|uplink=[[1xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|1xxx Messages]] ~~\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_1070\|Message 1070]]~~ }}