TUFLOW Message 2124: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 13:27, 15 February 2011 view source tuflow>Par No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 15:00, 2 February 2023 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: \|alt_msg=NA \|type=[[WARNING]] \|message_desc=No 2D connection specified for pit. Usually indicates that the SX has been omitted or typed incorectly in the 1d_nwk ~~Topo_ID~~GIS attribute. Conn_2D (previously Topo_ID). \|suggestions=Review pit to see if connection to the 2D model is intended, if so specify a valid connection type in the Conn_2D attribute. ~~\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2124\|Discuss Message 2124]]~~ ~~\|link3=''~~ ~~\|link4=''~~ ~~\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2123\|Message 2123]]~~ \|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|2xxx Messages]] ~~\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2125\|Message 2125]]~~ }}