Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 2169"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br> | |message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br> | ||
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both. | |suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both. | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|2xxx Messages]] | |uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|2xxx Messages]] | ||
− | + | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:48, 7 February 2023
TUFLOW Message
WARNING 2169 - THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored.
Alternate Message
NA
Message Type
WARNING
Description
THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.
Suggestions
Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.
Up |
---|
2xxx Messages |