TUFLOW Message 3027: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Teegan.Burke (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TUFLOW_Message |
{{TUFLOW_Message |
||
|tuflow_message=ERROR 3027 |
|tuflow_message=ERROR 3027 - Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0. |
||
<br> |
<br> |
||
|alt_msg= |
|alt_msg=NA<br> |
||
|type=[[ERROR]] |
|type=[[ERROR]] |
||
|message_desc=Materials may use use either fixed mannings, depth-varying mannings, or log-law roughness formulations for bed resistance. |
|||
|message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0. |
|||
When utilising log-law roughness, a maximum limit for equivalent mannings number is required as the formulation becomes singular at shallow depths. |
|||
|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths. |
|||
This limit, provided as the fixed mannings n value in the material data, must be greater than zero. |
|||
|suggestions=Ensure that all materials that utilise log-law roughness have positive values for mannings n. |
|||
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027|Discuss Message 3027]] |
|||
|link3='' |
|||
|link4='' |
|||
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026|Message 3026]] |
|||
|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|3xxx Messages]] |
|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|3xxx Messages]] |
||
|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3028|Message 3028]] |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 10:15, 3 March 2023
TUFLOW Message
ERROR 3027 - Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.
Alternate Message
NA
Message Type
ERROR
Description
Materials may use use either fixed mannings, depth-varying mannings, or log-law roughness formulations for bed resistance.
When utilising log-law roughness, a maximum limit for equivalent mannings number is required as the formulation becomes singular at shallow depths.
This limit, provided as the fixed mannings n value in the material data, must be greater than zero.
Suggestions
Ensure that all materials that utilise log-law roughness have positive values for mannings n.
| Up |
|---|
 3xxx Messages
|