Modelling Accuracy Uncertainties Impact Mapping: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Anne.Kolega (talk | contribs) |
Anne.Kolega (talk | contribs) m →What are the reasons why models vary widely in their accuracy?: for model to vary... |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
=What are the reasons
* The level of uncertainty/inaccuracy in the input data, especially uncertainties in hydrological inflows (which can be considerable) and topography.
* Whether the model is calibrated, and if calibrated, the range of calibration events and quantity/quality/type of calibration data. A model well calibrated to a range of flood events will be much more accurate than an uncalibrated model. More information on calibration can be found in <u>[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/October2016_FMA_Newsletter_HuxleyRyan.pdf Flood Modelling: How Accurate is Your Model?]</u> or an Australian Water School webinar <u>[https://www.tuflow.com/library/webinars/#maximise_accuracy Maximising Hydraulic Model Accuracy]</u>.
Line 19:
*Approach used for solving the underlying mathematical equations describing free surface fluid flow.
*Degree and quality of model calibration / verification.
=What is numerical noise?=
The nonlinear nature of the shallow water (long wave) equations used for modelling floods, can cause localised differences in the results that occur in locations well removed from where the model has changed. These differences should be treated as artefacts of the solution, often referred to as numerical noise.<br>
| |||