TUFLOW 1D2D Boundary Configuration Guidance: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 29:
==1D Timestep==
Selection of a 1D timestep that is too large can cause instability. The <u>[https://docs.tuflow.com/classic-hpc/manual/latest/ TUFLOW
During real world studies it is good practice to check the 1D timestep sensitivity: <br>
Line 57:
==SX Boundary Lines (2d_bc)==
2d_bc SX line features are often used to connect 1D structure to the 2D domain if the structure width is greater than one 2D cell wide (e.g. <u>[[
The 1D/2D linking cells in the 5m, 2m and 1m cell size models are shown in the the figure below.<br>
Line 93:
Consider the 1D-2D linking shown in Figure 1.5 The HX boundary “HXb1” shown in red is connected at each end to the same 1D node, whereas the remaining HX boundaries shown in purple are connected at each end to different 1D nodes. In the case that the flow is leaving the 2D domain to enter the 1D channel, the boundary is usually stable without energy correction, however for the reverse case, under high flow velocity conditions, the boundary may display instability or recirculation. If this does occur the problem may be remedied via an energy correction, using the command
<font color="blue"><tt>HPC Boundary Approach
[[File:1D2DHXEnergyCorrection.png|500px]]<br>
| |||