TUFLOW Output Discussion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Teegan.Burke (talk | contribs) |
Teegan.Burke (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 90:
== Why the high resolution (HR) mapped results have a significantly smaller extent than the standard (non-HR) grid outputs for a sub-grid-scale (SGS) enabled direct rainfall HPC model? ==
The high resolution (HR) outputs are based on <u>[[TUFLOW_HR_Output | intersecting]]</u> the standard water level output results with the HR DEM_Z. Due to the <u>[[TUFLOW_Output_Discussion#Why_are_the_values_of_the_mapped_water_level_results_.28h_max.29_lower_than_the_terrain_elevations_.28DEM_Z.29.3F | output limitation]]</u> for sub-grid-scale (SGS) enabled models with shallow sheet flow (particularly direct rainfall models) on sufficiently steep terrain, water levels can be output lower than the DEM_Z terrain elevations. This is due to the assumption (for output purposes) that water fills the SGS cell’s storage curve from the bottom, which differs from the approach of cell-average depth used computationally in TUFLOW HPC and by default in depth outputs. When the HR water level results are processed, the full extent of the
| |||