Groundwater Modelling Advice: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 20:05, 3 December 2025 view source Tuflowduncan (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 1,221 edits →How should peat soils be represented in a direct rainfall model? Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 13:14, 23 February 2026 view source Anne.Kolega (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 62 edits m →How can interflow behaviour be better aligned with observed conditions?: changed XDMF to XMDF Tag: Visual edit
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 22: === Python === The following python code, also available [https://gitlab.com/tuflow-user-group/tuflow/data-pre-processing/orifice_depth_discharge/-/blob/main/Orifice_Depth_Discharge_Curve.py here], can be used to generate depth vs discharge curves, which can then be input into a model with groundwater linking to 1D. <span style="color:#3776ab">'''import'''</span><span style="color:black"> math </span> Line 128: * Ensuring groundwater inputs and outputs are balanced is key. * Comparing groundwater accumulation areas with surface water flooding can help verify results. * Using the groundwater ~~XDMF~~XMDF output can assist in visualising flow behaviour and refining parameter selection. Fine-tuning soil properties, hydraulic conductivity, and boundary conditions will improve interflow simulation accuracy.