TUFLOW 1D2D Boundary Configuration Guidance: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Anne.Kolega (talk | contribs) |
Anne.Kolega (talk | contribs) m →What are the differences between how HX and SX boundary cells treat volume and transfer flow?: i.e. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 92:
TUFLOW HPC inflow boundaries may experience recirculation when a uniform elevation is defined along the length of the boundary. This problem may also occur along HX boundaries in 1D-2D linked models that outflow from the 1D to the 2D domain. This is not a common configuration, though may occur when using a 1D channel to convey the flow from a dam break or similar along a defined channel onto floodplains in the 2D domain.
Consider setting up the 1D-2D linking shown in
<font color="blue"><tt>HPC Boundary Approach </font> <font color="red">==</font> Method B</tt>. Note that this will likely cause water level lines to display some discontinuity between the 1D and 2D domain across the boundary.
Line 109:
==What are the differences between how HX and SX boundary cells treat volume and transfer flow?==
HX are effectively head boundaries and do not contribute to storage (head boundaries of all types, 1D or 2D of any software, do not contribute to storage as the water level is set rather than solve the mass balance equation as done for normal cells). SX cell storage is used as per a normal cell. <br>
No flow is transmitted across HX cell sides except for those sides adjoining a normal cell (
:*HX cells can transmit water to/from an adjoining SX cell.
:*HX cells can’t transmit to an adjoining HX cell.
| |||