Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Benchmarking"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | = | ||
= Independent Benchmark Testing = | = Independent Benchmark Testing = | ||
− | The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf | + | == United Kingdom Environment Agency == |
+ | The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br>[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf 2D Model Benchmarking] | ||
+ | == Consultant Benchmarking == | ||
+ | |||
= Hardware Benchmark Testing = | = Hardware Benchmark Testing = | ||
* [[Hardware_Benchmarking | Hardware Benchmarking]] | * [[Hardware_Benchmarking | Hardware Benchmarking]] |
Revision as of 03:38, 23 September 2015
=
Independent Benchmark Testing
United Kingdom Environment Agency
The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software:
2D Model Benchmarking