Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Benchmarking"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== United Kingdom Environment Agency == | == United Kingdom Environment Agency == | ||
The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br> | The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br> | ||
| − | *<font color="blue">[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling | + | *<font color="blue">[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 2010)]</font> |
| − | Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 2010)]</font> | ||
== Consultant Benchmarking == | == Consultant Benchmarking == | ||
Revision as of 04:20, 23 September 2015
Developer Benchmark Testing
University Thesis (Syme, 1991)
University Thesis (Barton, 2001)
University Thesis (Huxley, 2004)
University Thesis (Caddis, 2010)
University Thesis (Boyte, 2014)
Independent Benchmark Testing
United Kingdom Environment Agency
The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: