TUFLOW Message 1080: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|message_desc=Conveyance reduces with height within cross-section. |
|message_desc=Conveyance reduces with height within cross-section. |
||
|suggestions=1D open cross-sections should never have a decreasing conveyance with height, which indicates something is wrong with the representation of the cross-section shape and/or variation in roughness horizontally and/or vertically, or not using a parallel channel analysis approach can also cause this issue. Representation of the cross sections is recommended to be reviewed. |
|suggestions=1D open cross-sections should never have a decreasing conveyance with height, which indicates something is wrong with the representation of the cross-section shape and/or variation in roughness horizontally and/or vertically, or not using a parallel channel analysis approach can also cause this issue. Representation of the cross sections is recommended to be reviewed. |
||
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 1080|Discuss Message 1080]] |
|||
|link3='' |
|||
|link4='' |
|||
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_1079|Message 1079]] |
|||
|uplink=[[1xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|1xxx Messages]] |
|uplink=[[1xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|1xxx Messages]] |
||
|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_1081|Message 1081]] |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 22 December 2022
TUFLOW Message
WARNING 1080 - Conveyance decreasing with height for
Alternate Message
WARNING 1080 - Conveyance reduces with height within cross-section.
WARNING 1080 - K decreases
Message Type
WARNING
Description
Conveyance reduces with height within cross-section.
Suggestions
1D open cross-sections should never have a decreasing conveyance with height, which indicates something is wrong with the representation of the cross-section shape and/or variation in roughness horizontally and/or vertically, or not using a parallel channel analysis approach can also cause this issue. Representation of the cross sections is recommended to be reviewed.
| Up |
|---|
 1xxx Messages
|