TUFLOW Message 2835: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 14:13, 19 March 2020 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,368 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 17:15, 7 February 2025 view source ElizaCollison (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 3,894 edits No edit summary
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: {{TUFLOW_Message \|tuflow_message=ERROR 2835 - Not expecting point for bc type: ~~BC layer with type: QT~~"<>". \|alt_msg=ERROR 2835 - Not expecting line for bc type: "<>".<br> ~~\|alt_msg=NA~~ ERROR 2835 - Not expecting region for bc type: "<>".<br> \|type=[[ERROR]] \|message_desc=Not expecting point / line / region for BC type: "<>". A point / line / region is not valid for the boundary condition (BC) type "<>". ~~\|message_desc=TUFLOW QPC doesn't support 2d_bc point QT boundaries.~~ <br> ~~\|suggestions=Transform the boundaries into 2d_sa polygons.~~ From the 2023-03 release, a point-type QT boundary is not supported when using TUFLOW Classic / HPC (bringing the behaviour in line with Quadtree). ~~\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2835\|Discuss Message 2835]]~~ \|suggestions=Refer to the <u>[https://docs.tuflow.com/classic-hpc/manual/latest/ TUFLOW Manual]</u> for information on the BC type "<>" and its specifications. ~~\|link3=''~~ If a QT point was intended to be used as an internal inflow boundary, transitioning to a 2d_sa setup is recommended. For an external boundary, the preferred approach is to use a 2d_bc QT line snapped to the code polygon. ~~\|link4=''~~ ~~\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2815\|Message 2815]]~~ \|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|2xxx Messages]] ~~\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2844\|Message 2844]]~~ }}