TUFLOW Message 2075: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 13:13, 6 July 2022 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:34, 2 April 2026 view source Anne.Kolega (talk \| contribs) 228 edits m i.e. and typos Tag: Visual edit
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: \|alt_msg=NA \|type=[[WARNING]] \|message_desc=3D breakline with snapped point(s) does not have a point at its start. The line is assumed to be a 2D break line (iei.e.. a line of constant height). If using a breakline with ~~elevaton~~elevation points snapped anywhere along its length it should have points and the start and end of the line. In this case the elevation of the line ~~oject~~object is used.<br> <br> The geometry control file (.tgc) file command:<br> Line 10: \|suggestions=Add an elevation point to the end of the breakline or add the <font color="blue"><tt>Allow Dangling Z Lines </tt></font><font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><font color="black"><tt>ON</tt></font>. ~~\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2074\|Message 2074]]~~ \|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|2xxx Messages]] ~~\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2076\|Message 2076]]~~ }}