TUFLOW Version Backward Compatibility: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(29 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
=Backward Compatibility Change Register=
'''<font color="red">For changes in defaults post the 2017-09 build, see Chapter 18 of the <u>[https://docs.tuflow.com/classic-hpc/manual/latest/ TUFLOW Manual]</u>.'''</font>
{|class="wikitable"
Line 23 ⟶ 26:
|No backward compatible workaround provided.<br>
|-
|If using “<font color="blue"><tt>Reveal 1D Nodes</tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==</tt></font><tt>
|No backward compatible workaround provided.<br>
|-
Line 79 ⟶ 82:
| rowspan=2| 2012-05-AA
| New default settings – see <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt>PRE 2012-05</
| Set <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt>PRE 2012-05</tt> if similar results are required to the 2011-09 or 2010-10 releases.
|-
| The approach to the sizing of automatic manholes and the application of losses has been enhanced.
| Set <font color="blue"><tt>Manhole Approach </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt>Method A</
|-
Line 102 ⟶ 105:
| No workaround. Use the same platform (w32 or w64) for all simulations. Use <font color="blue">Model Platform</font> to force which platform should be used.
|-
| New default settings – see <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> PRE 2010-10</
| Set <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt>PRE 2010-10</tt> if similar results are required to the 2008-08 or 2009 07 releases.
|-
Line 116 ⟶ 119:
| rowspan=1| 2008-08-AC
| The default setting for <font color="blue"><u>Shallow Depth Stability Factor</u></font> has changed.
| Set <font color="blue"><tt>Shallow Depth Stability Factor </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
|-
Line 122 ⟶ 125:
|-
| Uses a new set of defaults for a number of commands (see <font color="blue">Defaults</font> ).
| The new defaults produce slightly different results, and very slight differences also occur between the three versions offered. For established models run using the 2007-07-XX builds, use <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt>PRE 2008-08</tt> to use the default settings used by the 2007-07-XX builds. Testing of a range of models has shown zero change in results if <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> PRE 2008-08</
|-
| The method for interpolating n values where the 2D Manning’s n varies with depth has been enhanced from a linear interpolation of the M (1/n) value to a spline interpolation of the n value. See <font color="blue"><u>Bed Resistance Depth Interpolation</u></font>.
Line 152 ⟶ 155:
| The new defaults may produce slightly different results. For established models run using the 2006-06-XX builds, use <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt>PRE 2007-07-AA</tt> to use the default settings used by the 2006-06-XX builds. Each of the new default settings and their affects are discussed in the rows below.
|-
| Change <font color="blue"><tt>Zero Material Values to One </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| Will not cause different results if a <font color="blue"><tt>Set Mat </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> 1</tt> is specified before other material settings in the .tgc file, or if every cell has been assigned a material value.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Inside Region </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method B</
| Testing thus far has not shown any difference between the two methods (other than the substantial gains in processing time of polygons).
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Line Cell Selection </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method D</
| May change results slightly, but improved stability and a smoother water levels along HX lines result.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>VG Z Adjustment </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> MAX ZC</
| May change results slightly, but stability should be significantly enhanced in some situations.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Bed Resistance Cell Sides </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| Will influence results, usually slightly, but more pronounced where there are sudden changes in Manning’s n values such as in the urban environment.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Culvert Flow </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method D</
<font color="blue"><tt>Culvert Critical H/D </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| The most significant influences are the selection of upstream or downstream controlled regimes depending on the H/D ratio, and the bug fix relating to Regime E if <font color="blue"><tt>Structure Losses </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
|-
| Changed the setting of the default width (if eN1 < 0.001) of automatic weirs over R and C channels (i.e. RW and CW) to be the diameter/width multiplied by the number of culverts (previously, the width was not multiplied by the number of culverts).
Line 178 ⟶ 181:
|-
| Bug fix that incorrectly set the water levels on dried VG cells (only applies to simulations with source inflows, e.g. SA or RF, somewhere within in the model).
| May cause slight changes in results. Backward compatibility provided if <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> PRE 2007-07-AA</
|-
| Fixed bug that did not correctly apply the reduction in conveyance for a FC BD (bridge deck) of FD (floating deck) cell using the 2d_fc Mannings_n attribute.
Line 189 ⟶ 192:
|-
| Uses a new set of defaults for a number of commands.
| The new defaults will produce different results. For established models run using the 2005-05-XX builds, use <font color="blue"><tt>Defaults </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> PRE 2006-06-AA</
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Cell Wet/Dry Depth </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> 0.002</
| The most pronounced effect of the shallower wet/dry depths is likely to occur in areas that are still filling at the flood peak, such as behind a levee that is only just overtopped. The shallower wet/dry depths provides a greater flow depth for a longer period over the levee.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Adjust Head at ESTRY Interface </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| Usually does not have a major influence on results except where very high velocities occur.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Boundary Cell Selection </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method C</
| May select slightly different cells along boundary/link lines. This may cause a difference where the line is along the top of levee, possibly creating a “hole” in embankment.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Viscosity Formulation </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| Can have a significant effect where the viscosity term is influential. This occurs where the friction term is less dominant (i.e. low Manning’s n and/or deeper water such as the lower, tidal, reaches of rivers).
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Structure Losses </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| Can have a significant affect in the vicinity of structures within a 1D network and for culvert networks. Does not affect 1D structures linked to a 2D domain or at the structure ends not connected to another 1D channel.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Storage Above Structure Obvert (%) </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| Usually negligible effect unless the model storage is predominantly within 1D closed sections (i.e. B, C and R channels). The 1D domain is likely to be more sensitive to instabilities due to the much smaller storage above the top of the closed sections, therefore, a smaller 1D timestep may be required and/or the Storage Above Structure Obvert (%) increased.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Depth Limit Factor </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| No effect as previously the model would have become “unstable” as the trigger for an instability was the top of the channel/node.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Culvert Flow </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method C</
| Usually only minor effects plus improved stability.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Culvert Add Dynamic Head </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
| Minor influence.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Bridge Flow </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method B</
| Negligible influence plus improved stability. However, note the different treatment of energy losses once the bridge deck obvert/soffit is submerged if a BG or LC table is specified.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>WLL Approach </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method B</
| Only affects the presentation of results. Note, that Method A is no longer recommended or supported.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Apply All Inverts </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
Does not affect hydraulic calculations, however, if a Blank, B or W channel is now lowered/raised because the inverts are now used, this will affect results/stability - see note at end of Apply All Inverts).
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Conveyance Calculation </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> ALL PARALLEL</
| Will affect results as ALL PARALLEL can be around 10% more “slippery” than CHANGE IN RESISTANCE. For calibrated or established models developed using build prior to Build 2006-06-AA , recommend setting to CHANGE IN RESISTANCE
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Flow Calculation </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method B</
| Negligible effect.
|-
|'''Builds prior to 2006-06-XX'''
| Contact
|
|}
|