TUFLOW General Discussion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 60:
* The 2020 TUFLOW release offers sub-grid topography sampling to process all elevations within the cell into a depth/volume relationship for its calculations. This approach ensures much more accurate water depth estimations at pit inlets, even if the 2D cell resolution is much larger than the geometry of the drain at the inlet. This in turn translates to more accurate representation of the pit inflow, and as such flow through the entire pipe network. No other 1D/2D stormwater drainage modelling software offers this functionality. The new Quadtree functionality also allows the user to model key flowpaths, such as road drains, in high resolution.
* The 2D overland approach used by TUFLOW ensures any above ground inundation is defined by the model topography. This approach avoids any engineering judgement flow path definition mistakes which the 1D overland software suffer from.<br>
* In addition, TUFLOW' s 1D solver (ESTRY) solves the full one-dimensional (1D) free-surface St Venant flow equations using a Runge-Kutta explicit solver. TUFLOW 1D has seen continuous development since 1972.The network schematisation technique used by TUFLOW 1D allows realistic simulation of a wide variety of 1D and quasi-2D situations including: complex river geometries; associated floodplains and estuaries; and urban channel and pipe network systems. There is a considerable amount of flexibility in the way network elements can be interconnected, allowing the representation of a river and floodplain by many parallel channels with different resistance characteristics and the simulation of braided streams and rivers with complex branching. This flexibility also allows a variable resolution within the network so that areas of particular interest can be modelled in fine detail, with a coarser network representation being used elsewhere.
 
==Can TUFLOW model flows in steep slopes accurately?==
Line 77:
:<font color="blue"><tt>Viscosity Coefficients </tt></font><font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font>k, n, muLow, muHigh, tau0
 
Where k is the viscosity coefficient in Pa.s when ''n'' = 1. Where ''n''=1, this relates to a Newtonian fluid. You can then use an appropriate value for tau0, the stress required to make the fluid move. The Non-Newtonian model uses the Herschel-Bulkley approach which can be used to model Newtonian fluids with different viscosities. See section 5.4 of the <u>[https://downloads.tuflow.com/TUFLOW/Releases/2020-10/TUFLOW%20Release%20Notes.2020-10-AD.pdf 2020 Release Notes]</u> for more information.
 
The graphs below explains the Herschel-Bulkley approach and it’s flexibility:
Line 99:
:[[File:Formula 004.PNG | 130px]]
 
It should be seen that where Ƭ0''Ƭ<sub>0</sub>=''0, the Herschel-Bulkley equation is the same as the power law model. If ''n'' is 1, then the Herschel-Bulkley equation is the same as the Bingham Plastic model. If Ƭ0''Ƭ<sub>0</sub>''=0 and ''n'' =1, then the Herschel-Bulkley equation is the same as the Newtonian fluid approach. By using the Herschel-Bulkley equation as a Newtonian model, it does allow you to define the viscosity coefficient for the fluid. InThere yourmay casebe you’lla need to convert the viscosity from centiStokes to Pa S (if using an N''n'' value of 1). YouIt canis thenalso possible to define the fluid density using the <font color="blue"><tt>Density of Water</tt></font> command you mention.
 
You can test this out using the following commands.
Line 106:
:<font color="blue"><tt>Viscosity Coefficients </tt></font><font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font>0.001, 1, 0.0, 1000, 0
 
This uses a ''n'' value of 1, a Ƭ0''Ƭ<sub>0</sub>''=0 and a viscosity coefficient of 0.001 Pa S which is a typical viscosity of water at 20 ℃. This should give comparable outputs to a standard TUFLOW model without the Non-Newtonian functionality.
 
== How closely do TUFLOW results match other hydraulic software? ==