TUFLOW Message 2835: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 10:03, 3 March 2023 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 17:15, 7 February 2025 view source ElizaCollison (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 3,894 edits No edit summary
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: \|type=[[ERROR]] \|message_desc=Not expecting point / line / region for bcBC type: "<>". A point / line / region is not valid for the boundary condition (BC) type "<>". <br> ~~\|suggestions=Please contact [mailto:support@tuflow.com support@tuflow.com].~~ From the 2023-03 release, a point-type QT boundary is not supported when using TUFLOW Classic / HPC (bringing the behaviour in line with Quadtree). \|suggestions=Refer to the <u>[https://docs.tuflow.com/classic-hpc/manual/latest/ TUFLOW Manual]</u> for information on the BC type "<>" and its specifications. If a QT point was intended to be used as an internal inflow boundary, transitioning to a 2d_sa setup is recommended. For an external boundary, the preferred approach is to use a 2d_bc QT line snapped to the code polygon. \|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|2xxx Messages]]