Revision as of 12:07, 19 July 2024 view source Emilie Nielsen (talk \| contribs) Administrators 6,125 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 15:07, 24 July 2025 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,368 edits No edit summary
Line 21: Image:GPU Stormwater Model Speed Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://downloads.tuflow.com/_archive/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)] Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2017/Apr/FloodStudies/Attachments/TechnicalSummary.PDF Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)] Image:Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[~~Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA)~~Hardware_Benchmarking \| Computer Hardware Benchmark Comparsions- What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]] </gallery> \|- Line 133: The link below summarises computer specifications and model simulation times for a benchmark model that is run using TUFLOW Classic (CPU) and TUFLOW GPU. The results are a useful resource for people who are upgrading hardware for the specific purpose of modelling.<br> * [[~~Hardware_Benchmarking_(2018-03-AA)~~Hardware_Benchmarking \| Hardware Benchmarking]]

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions