TUFLOW Message 2079: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 11:53, 1 October 2010 view source tuflow>Par No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:58, 23 December 2022 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: \|alt_msg=NA \|type=[[WARNING]] \|message_desc=3D breakline failed to modify any Zpts. For ~~Check~~example a zsh line with a "MAX" shape options will not modify any elevations, ~~snapping~~if ofcurrent ~~elevation~~cell ~~points~~elevations toare ~~breakline~~higher ~~and~~than ~~correct~~in ~~GIS~~the ~~projection~~breakline. ~~\|suggestions=????~~ Very short breaklines can also fail to select any cells using the TUFLOW "cross-hair" approach. See image below, click on image below for larger view. ~~\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2079\|Discuss Message 2079]]~~ ~~\|link3=''~~ [[File:CrossHair Cell Selection.jpg\|500px\|caption]] ~~\|link4=''~~ \|suggestions=Check elevations, snapping of elevation points to breakline and correct GIS projection. ~~\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2078\|Message 2078]]~~ \|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|2xxx Messages]] ~~\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2080\|Message 2080]]~~ }}