TUFLOW Message 2169: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 12:15, 1 October 2010 view source tuflow>Par No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 13:48, 7 February 2023 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: \|alt_msg=NA \|type=[[WARNING]] \|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br> \|suggestions=~~????~~Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both. ~~\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169\|Discuss Message 2169]]~~ ~~\|link3=''~~ ~~\|link4=''~~ ~~\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2168\|Message 2168]]~~ \|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|2xxx Messages]] ~~\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2170\|Message 2170]]~~ }}