TUFLOW Message 0305: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Rachel (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3:
|alt_msg=WARNING 0305 - Projection of .shp file is different to that specified by the GIS Projection == command.
|type=[[ERROR]] <br> [[WARNING]]
|message_desc=By default, TUFLOW checks that the projection in each '''.shp''' or '''.mif''' file matches that specified in the <fontSHP Projection color="green"><tt>= or MI Projection == </tt></font> command., respectively. This ensures that incoming files are in the same projection as the TUFLOW model. TUFLOW is not a GIS software and does not use the projection information in each file (apart for the check). TUFLOW uses the co-ordinates of the objects in the GIS layer and locates them in the TUFLOW model. Hence the need for a projection check. All model input files should be in the same projection, if inputs are not in the correct projection the data will be in the wrong location and won't be used. If your model is in (for example) MGA 94 zone 56, and the 2d materials (2d_mat) file is in the wrong projection (e.g. NSW ISG 56/1), these material regions (polygons) will be in the wrong location (probably in the middle of the ocean) and they won't be assigned to any model cells.<br>
This check prevents problems with the data provided having a different projection than the TUFLOW model.<br><br>
<br>
<u>Check File Options</u><br>
This check prevents problems with the data provided having a different projection than the TUFLOW model.<br>
This check can be set to give either an error (this is the default): <br>
<font color="green"><tt>
SHP Projection Check == ERROR<br>
<font color="green"><tt>MI Projection Check == OFFERROR</tt></font><br>
 
This checkmessage can be setdowngraded to givea either an error (this is the default)warning: <br>
<font color="green"><tt>MI Projection Check == ERROR</tt></font><br>
SHP Projection Check == WARNING<br>
This message can be downgraded to a warning:
<font color="green"><tt>MI Projection Check == WARNING</tt></font><br>
Or this check can be turned off entirely using:
<font color="green"><tt>MI Projection Check == OFF</tt></font><br>
 
Or this check can be turned off entirely using (use with caution!): <br>
Care should be taken if turning this check off!!
<font color="green"><tt>
SHP Projection Check == OFF<br>
MI Projection Check == OFF</tt></font><br>
 
Care should be taken if turning this check off!! that all files are in the correct projection.<br>
The fourth line of a .mif file contains the projection information, for example it may look like this:<br>
 
 
<u>Projection Files'''</u><br>
The .prj file associate with each shapefile, or the fourth line of a .mif file contains the projection information,. forFor example it may look like this:<br>
<tt>CoordSys Earth Projection 8, 104, "m", 177, 0, 0.9996, 500000, 10000000 Bounds (-7745844.29597, 2035.05676326) (8745844.29597, 19997964.9432)</tt><br>
<br>
Occasionally the last few numbers which are the bounds of the projection, can change even when the projection is the same. Of this occurs TUFLOW will report a "Message 0305".
 
Occasionally the last few numbers which are the bounds of the projection, can change even when the projection is the same. OfIf this occurs, TUFLOW will report a "Message 0305". This is a common occurrence when the same projection is written differently. There are two examples below that are the same projection however written differently:<br>
|suggestions=Check the projection of the problem file. This can be done in MapInfo by Selecting Table >> Maintenance >> Table Structure and selecting the Projection button.
 
Example 1:<br>
<tt>PROJCS["<font color="red">GDA94</font>_MGA_zone_54",GEOGCS["GCS_GDA_1994",DATUM["D_GDA_1994",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137,298.257222101]<br>
PROJCS["<font color="red">GDA_1994</font>_MGA_Zone_54",GEOGCS["GCS_GDA_1994",DATUM["D_GDA_1994",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137,298.257222101]</tt><br><br>
Example 2:<br>
<tt>PROJCS["GDA94_MGA_zone_54",GEOGCS["GCS_GDA_1994",DATUM["D_GDA_1994",SPHEROID["GRS_1980","<font color="red">6378137</font>,298.257222101]<br>
PROJCS["GDA94_MGA_zone_54",GEOGCS["GCS_GDA_1994",DATUM["D_GDA_1994",SPHEROID["GRS_1980","<font color="red">6378137.0</font>,298.257222101]</tt><br><br>
 
In the above case there is a slight difference in the number due to the decimals. Build 2020-01-AB parses the parameter data into number values and compares each of these numbers to check they are consistent. This should provide a more robust check less prone to falsely flagging the projections as different. A new '''.tcf''' command has been added to allow setting to the previous “Simple” string compare:<br>
<font color="green"><tt>SHP Projection Check Method == SIMPLE </tt></font><br>
 
 
|suggestions=As described above, different software (or even different versions of the same GIS software!) can write the same projection in a different way.
To avoid this happening, it is best to develop a model entirely within one GIS software (with the same version number). This can be difficult when given a model created by others or updated an existing model. If this is the case, we suggest:<br>
Check the projection of the problem file. This can be done in <br>
*QGIS by Layer Properties >> Source under the “Assigned Coordinate Reference System (CRS) header.<br>
|suggestions=Check the projection of the problem file. This can be done in *MapInfo by Selecting Table >> Maintenance >> Table Structure and selecting the Projection button.<br>
If this is different from the projection of the model, re-project to the correct projection.<br>
 
If the tablefile is in the same projection as the TUFLOW model, compare the projection line from the '''.shp''' or '''.mif''' file with that specified in the <font color="green"><tt>SHP Projection == </tt></font> or <font color="green"><tt>MI Projection == </tt></font> command. If the bounds are different, you can overwrite the projection line (line 4) in the problem '''.mifprj''' file associated with that in the projection.mif, re-import the file and export the file (backup first). This should correct the issue of the TUFLOW error without changing the GIS data. If multiple files are different, this message can be set to warning, however you should check all filesshapefile with this warning to ensure that they are in the same '''projection as the TUFLOW.mif!shp'''<br>
 
Or for MapInfor, overwrite the projection line (line 4) in the problem .mif file with that in the projection.mif, re-import the file and export the file (backup first). This should correct the issue of the TUFLOW error without changing the GIS data. If multiple files are different, this message can be set to warning (as described above), however you should check all files with this warning to ensure that they are in the same projection<br>
<br>
In order to change the projection in MapInfo it is necessary to save a copy of the table. To do this:<br>