FMA Challenge 3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 95:
Of particular interest is that reducing the n value to 0.1 has a significant effect on the arrival time of the flood waters at the model outlet (much earlier), and reduces the volume of water flowing onto the floodplain by around 20% due to the higher conveyance of the creek. Also of interest is that for the n=0.2 scenario, some overbank floodwaters return to the main creek near the model outlet causing a delayed second rise in the outlet flow hydrographs as illustrated in the chart further below. This effect does not occur for the n=0.1 scenario, with all overbank floodwaters remaining on the floodplain.<br>
 
Please note the scenarios provided in the legend below are as follows:<br>
100ft = 100ft cell resolution, no infiltration and channel roughness of 'n' = 0.2<br>
200ft*100ft = 200ft100ft cell resolution, no infiltration and channel roughness of 'n' = 0.2<br>
100ft (n0.1)*200ft = 100ft200ft cell resolution, no infiltration and channel roughness of 'n' = 0.12<br>
*100ft GA(n0.1) = 100ft cell resolution, Green and Amptno infiltration withand channel roughness of 'n' = 0.21<br>
*100ft GA = 100ft cell resolution, noGreen and Ampt infiltration andwith channel roughness of 'n' = 0.2<br>
*Inflow = Hydrograph input at northeastern QT boundary.<br>
 
[[File:FMA3_5.jpg|600px]]