FMA Challenge 3: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 95:
Of particular interest is that reducing the n value to 0.1 has a significant effect on the arrival time of the flood waters at the model outlet (much earlier), and reduces the volume of water flowing onto the floodplain by around 20% due to the higher conveyance of the creek. Also of interest is that for the n=0.2 scenario, some overbank floodwaters return to the main creek near the model outlet causing a delayed second rise in the outlet flow hydrographs as illustrated in the chart further below. This effect does not occur for the n=0.1 scenario, with all overbank floodwaters remaining on the floodplain.<br>
Please note the scenarios provided in the legend below are as follows:<br>
100ft = 100ft cell resolution, no infiltration and channel roughness of 'n' = 0.2<br>▼
*100ft
▲*100ft GA = 100ft cell resolution,
*Inflow = Hydrograph input at northeastern QT boundary.<br>
[[File:FMA3_5.jpg|600px]]
| |||