Revision as of 12:32, 12 January 2018 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,774 edits →Recently Uploaded ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:44, 12 January 2018 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,774 edits →Recently Uploaded Newer edit →
Line 12: {\| \|style="width:70%; vertical-align:top; color:#000; background:#B5CBDF; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"\| <gallery mode="packed-overlay" widths=200px heights=~~200px~~250px color:red> Image:UK_EA_Benchmark_Testing_2017_002.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/UK%20EA%202D%20Benchmarking%20Results.TUFLOW%20Products%202017-09.pdf UK Environment Agency 2D Benchmarking Results - TUFLOW Products (2017)] Image:~~HPC~~ GPU vsStormwater Model Speed ~~CPU~~Comparison 001.PNG\|[https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2017/Huxley2017_IECA-SQ%20Conference_Brisbane_pdf.pdf Rapid and Accurate Stormwater Drainage Assessments Using GPU Technology (2017)] Image:Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Calibration 001.PNG\|[https://www.qldreconstruction.org.au/u/lib/cms2/BNEFloodStudy/R.B20702.003.01.MR3.Detailed_Model_Development_and_Calibration.pdf Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Detailed Model Calibration (2016)] Image:~~Benchmark_2018_01_004~~Hardware_Benchmark_001.PNG\|[[Hardware_Benchmarking \| Computer Hardware Benchmarking - What Performs Best for TUFLOW Simulations]] </gallery> \|-

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions