Revision as of 06:58, 18 August 2018 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,785 edits →Test Case 2 - Urbanised Catchment ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:01, 18 August 2018 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,785 edits →Test Case 2 - Discussion Newer edit →
Line 159: As per Test Case 1, selection of the appropriate cell resolution during a real-world project requires consideration of the intended use of the results and also how the simulation run time impacts the overall project timeline. * Detailed integrated 1d1D/2D urban modelling may adopt the 15ft or slightly finer 12.5ft cell resolution if the cumulative simulation time for all model events/scenarios does not adversely impact the project timeline. This timeframe consideration is particularly relevant in locations such as Australia where an ensemble methodology is currently replacing single event approaches as a way to address uncertainty associated with hydrologic assumptions. * Broad-scale quick run simulation for urban flood forecasting purposes may adopt a coarser 20ft cell resolution or investigate the suitability of a 25ft cell resolution to achieve a quicker simulation turnaround time.

TUFLOW 2D Cell Size Selection: Difference between revisions