TUFLOW Message 2018: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
Content deleted Content added
| No edit summary | No edit summary | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| <u>[http://www.tuflow.com/Downloads/Publications/2006.05%20-%202D%20or%20Not%202D%20-%20An%20Australian%20Perspective.Syme.UK%20DEFRA%202006.pdf paper]</u> | <u>[http://www.tuflow.com/Downloads/Publications/2006.05%20-%202D%20or%20Not%202D%20-%20An%20Australian%20Perspective.Syme.UK%20DEFRA%202006.pdf paper]</u> | ||
| |suggestions=Specify a recognised 2D boundary type. | |suggestions=Specify a recognised 2D boundary type. | ||
| |discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2018|Discuss Message 2018]] | |||
| |link3='' | |||
| |link4='' | |||
| |prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2017|Message 2017]] | |prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2017|Message 2017]] | ||
| |uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|2xxx Messages]] | |uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|2xxx Messages]] | ||
Revision as of 15:58, 5 July 2022
TUFLOW Message 
ERROR 2018 - Unrecognisable 2D BC Type.
Alternate Message 
NA
Message Type 
ERROR
Description 
Unrecognisable 2D boundary condition Type. Valid 2D boundary conditions are:
- 2D
- HS
- HQ
- HT
- HX
- RF
- QC
- QT
- QT
- QT(A Flag)
- VC
- VT
- SA
- SH
- ST
- SX
- CN
- EC
- WT
- VG
- CD
- IG
- ZP
For more information on these boundary types see Table 4.32 (2D Boundary Condition and Link Types) of the 2010 TUFLOW Manual.
Suggestions 
Specify a recognised 2D boundary type.
| Up | 
|---|
|  2xxx Messages |