TUFLOW 2D Hydraulic Structures: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
What is the recommended method for representing a railway ballast area in TUFLOW? |
No edit summary |
||
Line 257:
Unfortunately, we have no data beyond the ends.
* hB/T ratios of less than 2 represent a very unusual bridge sitting low to the ground, and the peak FLC may increase above the end value (FLC of 0.42) in a way that doesn't follow the research trend or extrapolation. For these cases we would recommend using CFD modelling to obtain a more informed value. Alternatively, computing an FLC based on pressure flow might be considered.
* For hB/T ratios of greater than 6, the FLC is likely to continue to decrease, but probably not significantly. Clamping to the end value (FLC of 0.20) might be considered the more conservative approach (if the primary concern is flood levels upstream of the bridge).<br>
{{Tips Navigation
|uplink=[[ TUFLOW_Modelling_Guidance | Back to TUFLOW Modelling Guidance]]
| |||