FMA Challenge 2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 9:
*Variation in results due to 2D cell resoultion and whether or not the model should contain a 1D component;
*Looped batch files to run through scenarios; and
*The differences between two different 2D solvers, TUFLOW classic and TUFLOW GPU.
A key investigation of this FMA Challange is the performance of the differing 2D solution methods in representing measured flood levels during a historical event.
| |||