TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= |
|||
= Independent Benchmark Testing = |
= Independent Benchmark Testing = |
||
== United Kingdom Environment Agency == |
|||
The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf |
The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br>[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf 2D Model Benchmarking] |
||
== Consultant Benchmarking == |
|||
= Hardware Benchmark Testing = |
= Hardware Benchmark Testing = |
||
Revision as of 03:38, 23 September 2015
=
Independent Benchmark Testing
United Kingdom Environment Agency
The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software:
2D Model Benchmarking