Revision as of 03:49, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,774 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:15, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,774 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 2: = Developer Benchmark Testing = == Syme 1991 == [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dynamically%20Linked%202D%20and%201D%20Hydrodynamic%20Modelling,%20Syme,%201991.pdf Thesis(Syme, 1991)] == Barton 2001 == [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Flow%20Through%20an%20Abrupt%20Constriction%20-%202D%20Hydrodynamic%20Performance%20and%20Influence%20of%20Spatial%20Resolution,%20Barton,%202001.pdf Thesis (Barton, 2001)] == Huxley 2004 == [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/TUFLOW%20Validation%20and%20Testing,%20Huxley,%202004.pdf Thesis (Huxley, 2004)] == Caddis 2010 == == Boyte 2014 == [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/2012Boyte_DirectRainfallValidation.pdf Thesis (Boyte, 2014)] = Independent Benchmark Testing = == United Kingdom Environment Agency == The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br>~~[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf 2D Model Benchmarking]~~ <font color="blue">[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf 2D Model Benchmarking]</font> == Consultant Benchmarking == == Real World Validation == = Hardware Benchmark Testing =

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions