TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9:
== University Thesis (Huxley, 2004) ==
This thesis validates TUFLOW against independent analytical calculations. The study used over 300 benchmark models to verify the accuracy of TUFLOW for a range of flow conditions (super critical, critical and subcritical). The specific test cases included:
* 1D culvert flow;
* 1D weir flow;
* 2D weir flow;
* 2D channel flow;
* 2D floodplain flow; and
* 2D channel/floodplain flow.
The TUFLOW results were found to be within a 2% accuracy of the analytical estimates in 97% of the benchmark models.
*[http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/TUFLOW%20Validation%20and%20Testing,%20Huxley,%202004.pdf Thesis (Huxley, 2004)]
[File: Huxley_2004_Variance.PNG]
== University Thesis (Caddis, 2010) ==
| |||