Revision as of 05:24, 24 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,776 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:26, 24 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,776 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 16: <li>TUFLOW check files should also be reviewed to confirm that the correct form losses are being applied.</li> <li>The flow area through the structure should also be reviewed.If the overall structure flow area is not correct, then the velocities within the structure will not be correct and therefore the energy losses due to the changes in velocity direction and magnitude and additional form losses will not be well modelled. * Digitise a ~~2d_po~~''Plot Output'' QA (<font color="blue">Read GIS PO</font> <font color="red">==</font> 2d_po_...)line through the structure from bank to bank, and use this output to cross-check the flow area of the 2D FC cells is appropriate (the QA line will take into account any adjustments to the 2D cells due to FC obverts and changes to the cell side flow widths). </li>

TUFLOW 2D Hydraulic Structures: Difference between revisions