Revision as of 02:29, 26 September 2015 view source Steph.dufour (talk \| contribs) 756 edits →Other Benchmark Studies ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:57, 28 September 2015 view source Steph.dufour (talk \| contribs) 756 edits →Other Benchmark Studies Newer edit →
Line 72: [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM Conference, 2011)]</li> <li>The Environment Agency in the United Kingdom have documented independent testing of most 2D modelling packages~~. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software~~. Testing was undertaken in both 2010 and 2013. ~~All~~and all three TUFLOW engines were submitted for ~~the~~testing ~~latter~~in ~~testing~~2013. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br> [http://evidence.environment-agency.gov.uk/FCERM/Libraries/FCERM_Project_Documents/SC120002_Benchmarking_2D_hydraulic_models_Report.sflb.ashx Benchmarking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2013)]</li> *[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2010)]</li>

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions