HPC FAQ: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 60:
* Be more thorough in reviewing the model results. Although this is best practice for any modelling, it is paramount for unconditionally stable solvers like HPC that thorough checks of the model’s flow patterns, performance at boundaries and links is carried out.
* The CME%, which is an excellent indicator that the Classic 2D solver is numerically converging, is not generally of use for HPC, which is volume conserving and effectively 0% subject to numerical precision. Non-zero whole of model CME% for HPC 1D/2D linked models is usually an indication of either the 1D and 2D adaptive timesteps being significantly different, or a poorly configured 1D/2D link.<br>
 
<br>
===Further Support===
If you experience an issue that is not detailed above or in one of our other <font color = "blue"><tt>HPC modelling guidance pages</tt></font> please a send an email to support@tuflow.com