Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 3027"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Teegan.Burke (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{TUFLOW_Message |tuflow_message=ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0. <br> |alt_msg=None |type=ERROR |message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n va...") |
Teegan.Burke (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|type=[[ERROR]] | |type=[[ERROR]] | ||
|message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0. | |message_desc=The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0. | ||
− | |suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value based on the n value that would normally be applied is | + | |suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths. |
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027|Discuss Message 3027]] | |discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027|Discuss Message 3027]] |
Revision as of 09:37, 20 April 2018
TUFLOW Message
ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.
Alternate Message
None
Message Type
ERROR
Description
The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0.
Suggestions
A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.
Up |
---|
3xxx Messages |