Revision as of 16:21, 16 August 2018 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,785 edits →Test Case 1 - Rural Dam Break ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:22, 16 August 2018 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,785 edits →Test Case 1 - Results Newer edit →
Line 55: == Test Case 1 - Results == In the interest or keeping this page brief we have focused our result presentation on EA reporting points 4 and 5. Their location furthest downstream in the catchment makes them the most sensitive of all EA 7 reporting points. This is due to any divergence in result ~~due~~caused toby poor representation of the upstream topography accumulating, amplifying the result difference associated with a change in cell resolution at these selection locations. <br> Results are presented below. Although the figures are shown in sequence (from fine to coarse resolution), the results are overlayed on one another moving through the dataset so it obvious if poor convergence occurs. <br>

TUFLOW 2D Cell Size Selection: Difference between revisions