Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 3519"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{TUFLOW_Message |tuflow_message=ERROR 3519: Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model. |alt_msg=NA |type=ERROR |message_desc=If the DEM is fine enough, SGS can preserve the...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TUFLOW_Message | {{TUFLOW_Message | ||
| − | |tuflow_message= | + | |tuflow_message=CHECK 3519: Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model. |
|alt_msg=NA | |alt_msg=NA | ||
| − | |type=[[ | + | |type=[[CHECK]] |
| − | |message_desc=If the DEM is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. | + | |message_desc=If the DEM is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. In such case using a gully line may overestimate the width of the flow path as it makes the entire cell and face flat. |
|suggestions=Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line without using topography modification. | |suggestions=Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line without using topography modification. | ||
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3519|Discuss Message 3519]] | |discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3519|Discuss Message 3519]] | ||
Revision as of 13:15, 9 July 2020
TUFLOW Message
CHECK 3519: Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model.
Alternate Message
NA
Message Type
CHECK
Description
If the DEM is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. In such case using a gully line may overestimate the width of the flow path as it makes the entire cell and face flat.
Suggestions
Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line without using topography modification.
| Up |
|---|
 3xxx Messages
|