Revision as of 13:14, 9 July 2020 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,384 edits Created page with "{{TUFLOW_Message \|tuflow_message=ERROR 3519: Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model. \|alt_msg=NA \|type=ERROR \|message_desc=If the DEM is fine enough, SGS can preserve the..."		Revision as of 13:15, 9 July 2020 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,384 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1: {{TUFLOW_Message \|tuflow_message=~~ERROR~~CHECK 3519: Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model. \|alt_msg=NA \|type=[[~~ERROR~~CHECK]] \|message_desc=If the DEM is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. inIn such case using a gully line may overestimate the width of the flow path as it ~~make~~makes the entire cell and face flat. \|suggestions=Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line without using topography modification. \|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3519\|Discuss Message 3519]]

TUFLOW Message 3519: Difference between revisions