TUFLOW Message 3519: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2:
|tuflow_message=CHECK 3519: Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model.
|alt_msg=NA
|type=[[CHECK]] applies a gradient along the face based on the cell corners and
|type=[[CHECK]]
cell side Zpt values and for thick lines uses the ZC, ZU, ZV and ZH values to apply a sloping cell area
|message_desc=If the DEM's resolution is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gully along the cells without using any gully line. In such case using a gully line may overestimate the width of the flow path as it makes the entire cell and face flat.
for the cell volume.
|message_desc=If the DEM's resolution is fine enough, SGS can preserve the gullyflow path along the cells/faces without using any gully line. InBy such case usingdefault, a gully line mayapplies overestimatea thegradient width ofalong the flow path asfaces itbased makeson the entire cell corners and face flat.
cell side Zpt values, and creates sloping cells using the ZC, ZU, ZV and ZH values. It dose insure a continuous flow path, but the spatial accuracy may become lower comparing to the approach of sampling elevation directly from DEM.
|suggestions=Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line. If so, the topography modification MIN or GULLY option can be removed.
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3519|Discuss Message 3519]]