Revision as of 15:35, 18 November 2021 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,774 edits →What is the difference between using polyline and polygon for 2D bridges and when should I use either approach? ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:35, 18 November 2021 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,774 edits →What form loss coefficient (FLC) values should I use for 2d_lfcsh bridge? Newer edit →
Line 50: Layered flow constriction layers: * Layer 1 - Underneath the bridge deck: A good starting point is to use the method for estimating form losses from bridge piers~~. This method is summarised in <u>[[TUFLOW_2D_Hydraulic_Structures \| TUFLOW_2D_Hydraulic_Structures]]</u>~~. It estimates the form loss coefficient from the ratio of the area occupied by piers and other flow obstructions relative to the gross area of the bridge opening. If there are no piers or obstructions the FLC should be zero.<br> * Layer 2 - Bridge deck:

TUFLOW 2D Hydraulic Structures: Difference between revisions