TUFLOW Message 2169: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|type=[[WARNING]] |
|type=[[WARNING]] |
||
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br> |
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br> |
||
par??? <u>Insert diagram or diagrams here</u> |
|||
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both. |
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both. |
||
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169|Discuss Message 2169]] |
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169|Discuss Message 2169]] |
||
Revision as of 09:08, 4 July 2022
TUFLOW Message
WARNING 2169 - THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored.
Alternate Message
NA
Message Type
WARNING
Description
THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.
Suggestions
Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.
| Up |
|---|
 2xxx Messages
|