TUFLOW Message 2169: Difference between revisions

From Tuflow
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br>
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br>
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.

|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169|Discuss Message 2169]]
|link3=''
|link4=''
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2168|Message 2168]]
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_2168|Message 2168]]
|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|2xxx Messages]]
|uplink=[[2xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|2xxx Messages]]

Revision as of 13:55, 6 July 2022

TUFLOW Message
WARNING 2169 - THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored.

Alternate Message
NA

Message Type
WARNING

Description
THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.

Suggestions
Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.


Up
2xxx Messages