TUFLOW Message 3027: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Teegan.Burke (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths. |
|suggestions=A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths. |
||
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3027|Discuss Message 3027]] |
|||
|link3='' |
|||
|link4='' |
|||
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026|Message 3026]] |
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3026|Message 3026]] |
||
|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|3xxx Messages]] |
|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|3xxx Messages]] |
||
Revision as of 15:19, 13 July 2022
TUFLOW Message
ERROR 3027: Roughness height specified but nLim less than 0.
Alternate Message
None
Message Type
ERROR
Description
The limiting Manning’s n value, required for specifying bed resistance with the theoretically derived log law for shallow flows, must be greater than or equal to 0.0.
Suggestions
A limiting Manning’s n value (based on the n value that would normally be applied) is specified to transition to conventional n values at greater depths.
| Up |
|---|
 3xxx Messages
|