Revision as of 16:06, 9 December 2022 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,384 edits →How to best convert flow constriction data (2d_fc or 2d_fcsh) into newer formats (2d_lfcsh or 2d_bg)? ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:35, 12 December 2022 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,384 edits →Should I model bridges in 1D or 2D Domain? Newer edit →
Line 244: == Should I model bridges in 1D or 2D Domain? == The recommended approach typically depends on the study objectives and if the channel upstream and downstream of the bridge is modelled in 1D or 2D. To preserve the momentum as accurately as possible the bridge should be modelled in the same dimension as the channel, e.g. 1d_nwk bridge if the channels is in 1D and 2d_lfcsh if the channel is modelled in 2D.<br> <br>

TUFLOW 2D Hydraulic Structures: Difference between revisions