Revision as of 13:19, 24 January 2024 view source Abigail.lillo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 539 edits →Real World Calibration/Validation ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:22, 5 April 2024 view source Emilie Nielsen (talk \| contribs) Administrators 6,425 edits →Other Benchmark Studies Newer edit →
Line 94: [https://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/Dambreak_Benchmark_ANCOLD2018_WRM.pdf Assessing the Accuracy of a Two-dimensional Hydraulic Model for Dambreak Analysis: Sheehy et al (ANCOLD, 2018)]</li> <li>The Environment Agency in the United Kingdom have documented independent testing of most 2D modelling packages. Testing was undertaken in both 2010 and 2013 and all three TUFLOW engines were submitted for testing in 2013. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software. The tests have subsequently been rerun and documented using the latest version of TUFLOW in 2017: <br> [https://~~evidence.environment-agency~~www.gov.uk/~~FCERM~~government/~~Libraries~~publications/~~FCERM_Project_Documents/SC120002_Benchmarking_2D_hydraulic_models_Report.sflb.ashx~~benchmarking-the-latest-generation-of-2d-hydraulic-flood-modelling-packages Benchmarking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2013)]</li> *[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2010)] The above benchmark documents have been superseded by the document below. It is a revision of the benchmark modelling using the 2017-09-AC version of TUFLOW. It includes results for TUFLOW Classic, FV, GPU and the new TUFLOW HPC solver.

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions