Revision as of 13:50, 22 January 2025 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,372 edits →Can I model bridge piers explicitly in 2D using very small cells? ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:51, 22 January 2025 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,372 edits →What are the limitations of explicitly modelling bridge piers in TUFLOW? Newer edit →
Line 239: == What are the limitations of explicitly modelling bridge piers in TUFLOW? == Explicitly representing small-scale obstructions, such as bridge piers, in TUFLOW ~~requires~~might require extremely fine mesh resolutions. This results in significantly higher computational costs and often fails to accurately capture the complex flow phenomena. Additional head losses caused by drag characteristics are better represented through empirical coefficients rather than direct modelling. For more information please see: <u>[[TUFLOW_2D_Hydraulic_Structures#Can_I_model_bridge_piers_explicitly_in_2D_using_very_small_cells.3F \| Can I model bridge piers explicitly in 2D using very small cells?]]</u>

TUFLOW 2D Hydraulic Structures: Difference between revisions