TUFLOW CATCH Tutorial M02 Results QGIS: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 13:
[[File: image of summary with arrows pointing to devices and pollutants]]<br>
<br>
<li> bufferStrip1Notice hasthat no paddocks near it, and thereforebufferStrip1 has no pathogen masses entering or being removed., as it has no paddocks near it.
<li> If the removed mass is divided by the cumulative mass, the resulting value represents either the removal constant (if a constant removal equation was used), or the average removal performance (if a table removal method was used). For example, in trench1, the removal performance for SED_CLAY is calculated by: rem SED_CLAY [g] / cum SED_CLAY [g] = 0.4. This matches the removal constant defined in the .tcc. In contrast, bufferStrip1 uses a table removal method for SED_CLAY, resulting in: rem SED_CLAY [g] / cum SED_CLAY [g] = 0.999. This shows that bufferStrip1 removed significantly more clay than trench1. The graph below demonstrates this calculation for each pollutant across all the treatment devices: <br>
<br>